Wednesday, 27 August 2014

Hate in the minds of Politicians.



Dear Sir,

One of the viewer of my article at Times of India has lodged objection, which I had written with respect to the controversial video of BJP Member of Parliament Yogi Adidnath from Gorakhpur.  In said video the BJP MP omit venom of highest value, against Muslims and Muslim girls.  Bhartiya Janta Party’s Member of Parliament Yogi Adidnath called upon to all the Hindus and his followers to convert 100 Muslim Girls if any Muslim converting a single Hindu girl to Islamism.  He has omitted several objectionable contents against Muslims and Islam.  It is indeed matter of great concern for the civilised and modern India, if a member of parliament has got venom of extreme level against Islam and Muslims then what would be the percentage of venom of common Hindus against Muslims.  If any Muslim man love to any Hindu girl and that girl accept Islam by choice and not by force under such situation these terrorists of Yogi Adidnath forcibly convert Muslim girls or commit communal violence which is totally unconstitutional and against the Indian law.


One of the viewers of my article raised the objection on the word Hindu terrorists; and justified the wording of Yogi Adidnath as the freedom of speech and expression. Contrary, he alleged on Muslims as the Jihadi with some highly objectionable words he used for Allaha and Prophet Sallam.  He further asked me questions why Muslims are trouble makers they are having trouble with BJP MP but what about Salman Rushdee why Muslims across the Globe criticized to him.


That is also agony with Muslims that all comments of the viewer though which are objectionable also as far as Islam and Muslims are concerned, published but when my turn of reply come, times group blocked the comments stating the contents of the comment is objectionable.  However it is my responsibility to reply for the unsolved questions and would like to ask the viewers of my article across the Globe and India, is my answer contents objectionable contents?


Areeee Idiot nude painting is the practice of Hindu god and goddess, do you have a little mind. Go to Kahjoraho Temple, go to Kerala Temples, go to Ajanta Elloora caves go to Elephenta cabes everywhere you will find the Hindu Gods are in sex with Goddess. OK as Hussain commit anything wrong ask Hindu Terrorists to destroy all the temples engraved Hindu God and Goddess in nude and having sex.  I guess you don’t have mindset; India is going on the right path to become a terrorist’s nation. I am sure and that will happen. International community is laughing at the thoughts of Indians and India.  Secondly, crime is crime when Indians had hate with Salman Khan when he assaulted to Ashvariya then why they started love to him now.  If they have problem with Amir first wife then what is the meaning of love.  Nothing you are the production of Terrorists and you justified your point of view.  Salman is being loved to you because he is no more Muslim he has become Hindu doing every sort of anti Islamic Act.  OK you are asking about Salman Rushdee, I am asking a question if Salman Rushdee written any book wherein he raised finger on the chastity of Sita or if at all he wrote a book wherein he mentioned illegitimate love story of Sita and Ravana, he justified that Sita willingly runaway with Ravana.  He raised the questions on legitimacy of Lov and Kush and they are the outcome of illegal affair of Sita and Ravan that is the only reason Sita had given Agni Pariksha then still you love Salman Rushdee, and want his book to come in open market.


What I understand the issues which hurt the Muslim sentiments and person concerned is become hero for Hindu hardliners, but they don’t even think just reverse to the subject.  Tasleema Nasreen had been invited by Modi in communal Guj after 2002 and he asked to Tasleema our Gujaratis holding big hearts we will welcome you in Gujarat come and settle here. This statement of Modi had come after 2002 when planned policy of Sanghi Terrorists along with Govt machinery of Gujarat working to remove all Bangladeshis from communal Guj.  At that time only I asked with Modi, who is Tasleema is she an Indian, you are working to remove all Bangladeshi from communal Guj then what is the reason to settle a Bangladeshi in your state. Why this extreme love for a Bangladeshi lady and double standard of your Government.


Now Indian public has to decide if things which are not correct for the nation or state how it would be correct for single person, only because he or she hurts the sentiments of particular part of the society.  It is correct.



Zuber Ahmed Khan

No comments:

अब्दुल कुर्सी का हक़दार है.

हर कोंग्रेसी की सोच मिल्लत से ग़द्दारी वाली है. भलें आज मौलाना अब्दुल कलाम आज़ाद के लिए बड़े क़सीदे लिखे जातें हैं. उन्होंने तंज़ीम का भला किया ल...