Dear Sir,
In continuation
of my article “Afzal Guru a Martyr or
Terrorist.” and my all the articles and letters addressed to the Judicial,
Government and Administrative authorities of India, wherein I am concerned and
anxious the way in which Muslims are being targeted and trapped in the legal
terrorism of India. Fact is always
bitter and no power in the Globe can change the fact. And fact is Indian Government and President
swam away in the sentiments of Hindu Hardliners in case of Afzal Guru. Because crime on Afzal has not been proved in
the court of law but looking at the sentiments of crores of the people of India
he has been hanged to death.
Now question
arises if Afzal was not terrorist and the way the punishment executed hanged to
death to him and he was projected as terrorist, then who is real terrorist,
whether system of India where politicians decide the fate of human or people of
India, who if with common voice loud “death penalty”, whether, crime has proved
against criminal or not, but he has to move to the gallows. Because
whatever Supreme Judicial Authority of India admitted “the Supreme Court admitted that the evidence
against Afzal was only circumstantial, and that there was no evidence that he
belonged to any terrorist group or organisation. He was subsequently meted out
three life sentences and a double death sentence.”
If Afzal was
not terrorist as alleged by the Indian Government Authorities and police
intentionally arrested him and send him to the gallows then what would be the
compensation to the people of Kashmir and to his family members specially an
innocent son of 12 years. Because the evidence against Afzal included his confessional
statement, which was recorded by the DCP, Special Cell was proved as statement
given in the pressure, because DCP had
asked the policemen present there to leave the room. After that he had warned and explained to
Afzal that he was not bound to make the confessional statement and that if he
did so, it could be used against him as evidence. In the interview given to several media
houses, Afzal openly confessed the crime which he had not committed.
As per the senior
Lawyer of the Supreme Court Ms Kamini Jaiswal revealed that these confessions
were made under duress Ms. Kamini was representing him in the Supreme Court of
India. Sushil Kumar, Afzal's advocate later
claimed that Afzal had written a letter to him where Afzal said that he had
made the confessions under duress as his family was being threatened.
Indian
Government always ahead to distribute the charities “Bheekh” whether it is in
the form of Article 370 special status to the Kashmir, in the year 1948 to calm
down the rage of the people of Kashmir against the joining of Raja Hari Singh
to India. What is the current status of
Article 370? Or after 6 decades it is
again Government of India pacify the rage of the people of Kashmir against
hanging of Afzal Guru and recommending
the name of Parvez Rasool in the Indian Cricket Team. Such types of attitude can not apply the
ointment on the wounds of the Kashmiri people.
If Afzal Guru has been wrongly executed, then it would be irreparable
loss to the Kashmir and it would not be heal up merely given a chance to a
Kashmiri cricketer to the Indian cricket squad.
Afzal was the
icon for the independence of Kashmir if at all he is wrongly convicted and his
death can be compensated anything would be the libration of Kashmir from Indian
occupation or absolute autonomy to the Kashmir.
If at all Afzal
Guru was a Jihadi and he has given correct sentence. Then it would not halt the Jihadi activities
in India, Government has to reform her act towards the Muslims.
It is prayed
1. Callback the
Indian Army from Kashmir & Remove the controversial Law AFSPA.
2. Implement
the intraocular report on Kashmir.
3.
Any other relief as the authorities deem fit and
proper.
Thanking
you,
Yours
faithfully,
4 comments:
Nice Eye Opening Post .
Thanks Bro.
Let's at least get the facts right - shall we ?
Otherwise the only thing the readers eyes are opened
to is how one-sided your blog is.
Here's his direct video confession.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/video/mohamammed-afzal-guru-pranab-mukherjee-parliament-attack-case/1/249612.html
Here's details of how direct the evidence was against him -
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130217/news-current-affairs/article/delay-execution-afzal-guru-unjustified-former-solicitor-general
Dear bro anonymous, same thing i expressed in my article. Yes there are confessional statements made by Guru, in front of the Media personnel print or electronic, but they are all made in the pressure. And he had asked to do so failing which his family may come under trouble.
Post a Comment