Dear Sir,
Legal Personalities involved in crimes should get punishment double than that of common person.
On 13/04/2011 Historic order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Wherein Hon’ble Supreme Court declared fake encounter killings by policemen “Cold-Blooded”. In fact in my previous correspondence with Supreme Court, President & P.M. I had shown my concerned on the fake encounters. I stress on the killing of the people by the police in a legal way. As if, police have license to kill anybody in the name of encounter. Police party killed all the men on the tag of Terrorism, and as the word terrorism added behind the deceased, no body can raised finger on the act of police. I asked the P.M. that practice of police party must be stopped, and an action must be initiated against the police personnel involved in the cold-blooded murder. Police have no right to kill a human, even if that particular person is indeed terrorists. In most of the cases, police have killed innocent persons in the name of terrorism; most of them were illiterate, unemployed, poor & Muslim youths.
Supreme Court very correctly notified and asked to refuse the illegal order of superior to the policeman to carry out the ‘Fake Encounter’ failing which the policeman held guilty of murder and will be sentenced to death.
In most of the cases especially in Maharashtra, UP, JK, and Gujarat police personal act like a contract killer. Rival group paid the supari to the police for the person to be killed. Now it would become the responsibility of police how to manage the plot of fake encounter theory. CBI should carry out a detail inquiry for all the encounters in Maharashtra, UP, JK & Gujarat.
Not only police personnel, there should be taboo on the Judges also, High Court as well as Supreme Court. Recently then Chief Justice of India Mr. K.G. Balakrishnan shared the dies with Genocide, Gang Rape culprit Narendra Modi. Which is out of ethics and decorum of Supreme Court and raises several questions on the act of then Chief Justice of India?
The punishment should be double to the judicial personnel in comparison to the layman. Because judicial personnel knows the consequence behind the criminal activities and still they committing the crime, so punishment should be double than that of common man who don't know the legal consequences behind the crime.
Thanking you,
Yours Sincerely,
Zuber Ahmed Khan
No comments:
Post a Comment