Ref: My article “Influence of ‘Saffron Brigade’ on Indian Judiciary...” of dated 24/09/10.
Dear Sir,
1. Long awaited judgement of 6 decades has come out on 30/09/2010, which also opens the influence of saffron elements on Indian Judiciary. Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court delivered the Judgement about 2.5 acares land of Babri Masjid at Ayodhya. It is not surprising that once again the judgement goes against the Muslims and appeasing the Hindus. Merely one third land has allotted to Muslims that means Muslims are on the Charity of Judiciary. Remaining judgement favours the Hindus including removing of Idol Ramalala, temple demolished by Babar and it is the birth place of Lord Rama & so on.
2. Ram is the mythical character has got no historic value. How it is possible the idols of Ram Lala has immerged without any external support. If the man made structures started emerging then Indian Government should stop her functioning and be remain on Ram Bharose.
3. Judiciary is not believing or working on the sentiments or religious belief. It is working on the facts and documentary evidences especially in the suit property or land disputes. There is no direct proof that a temple has been demolished by the Emperor Babar.
4. Judicial verdict of Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High court is communal biased and politically motivated deprives the Muslim community, the legal rights on suit property or land.
It is prayed:
1. Before appointing a judicial person his back ground and communal mentality should be scrutinised.
2. Reserve 20% Muslims in Judiciary, police services and Indian Army.
3. The Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court transgress its impartial attitude in suit property or land disputes and divided the land into three parts which perhaps had no rights to do so.
4. The Judiciary has always supported the aggressors in this dispute. Even Prime Minister Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru had ordered to remove the Ramlala idol from Babri Masjid central dome, yet the Union Home Minister Vallabh Bhai Patel, UP Chief Minister Govend Vallabh Panth and the Faizabad Court disobeyed the order. The culprits of 22/12/1949 who illegally interjected Ramlala idol under the central dome of Babri Masjid were not prosecuted in log 60 years.
5. Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court should have honoured the orders of Late P.M. P.V. Narsimha Rao issued on 7/12/1992 for the removal of make shift temple from Babri Masjid site, and ought to have considered this fact in his verdict.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Zuber Ahmed Khan
Dear Sir,
1. Long awaited judgement of 6 decades has come out on 30/09/2010, which also opens the influence of saffron elements on Indian Judiciary. Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court delivered the Judgement about 2.5 acares land of Babri Masjid at Ayodhya. It is not surprising that once again the judgement goes against the Muslims and appeasing the Hindus. Merely one third land has allotted to Muslims that means Muslims are on the Charity of Judiciary. Remaining judgement favours the Hindus including removing of Idol Ramalala, temple demolished by Babar and it is the birth place of Lord Rama & so on.
2. Ram is the mythical character has got no historic value. How it is possible the idols of Ram Lala has immerged without any external support. If the man made structures started emerging then Indian Government should stop her functioning and be remain on Ram Bharose.
3. Judiciary is not believing or working on the sentiments or religious belief. It is working on the facts and documentary evidences especially in the suit property or land disputes. There is no direct proof that a temple has been demolished by the Emperor Babar.
4. Judicial verdict of Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High court is communal biased and politically motivated deprives the Muslim community, the legal rights on suit property or land.
It is prayed:
1. Before appointing a judicial person his back ground and communal mentality should be scrutinised.
2. Reserve 20% Muslims in Judiciary, police services and Indian Army.
3. The Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court transgress its impartial attitude in suit property or land disputes and divided the land into three parts which perhaps had no rights to do so.
4. The Judiciary has always supported the aggressors in this dispute. Even Prime Minister Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru had ordered to remove the Ramlala idol from Babri Masjid central dome, yet the Union Home Minister Vallabh Bhai Patel, UP Chief Minister Govend Vallabh Panth and the Faizabad Court disobeyed the order. The culprits of 22/12/1949 who illegally interjected Ramlala idol under the central dome of Babri Masjid were not prosecuted in log 60 years.
5. Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court should have honoured the orders of Late P.M. P.V. Narsimha Rao issued on 7/12/1992 for the removal of make shift temple from Babri Masjid site, and ought to have considered this fact in his verdict.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Zuber Ahmed Khan
No comments:
Post a Comment