A Caliphate to whom every Muslim should follow.

Dear Head of All Muslim Countries,

Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi who has been declared as the Caliphate of Islam in Iraq on 29^th June 2014 by a group of the Muslims who are defending Islam and Muslims across the Globe.  Now it is the request with all the Heads of Muslim Countries they follow him to expand the Islamic States.  Heads of Islamic State should negotiate with him in the formation of Federation of all Muslim countries rather to counter him in the form of war or Military action. 

Those Indian and International Media defaming Al-Baghdadi as terrorists, Satan or Executioner (jallad) they deserve the retaliation in the form of litigation or whatsoever in any other way.  Al- Baghdadi is the spiritual head of the Mosque at Iraq and such types of wording for the spiritual head of Mosque should be strictly resented by the Muslim world. It is not the insult to Al-Baghdadi but Caliphate of Islam.

Normally derogatory wordings and word like terrorism is reserved only for the Muslims.  Media become blind when Buddhist Terrorists killed several Muslims in Sri Lanka; they are become blind when Bodo Terrorists killed uncountable Muslims in Assam.  They become blind when Indian forces killed several innocent Kashmiri Muslims in Kashmir.  They become blind when Jews Terrorists killed uncountable Palestine Muslims in Terrorists Israel.  They become blind when Buddhists Terrorists killed several Muslims in Myanmar.  They become blind when America and Allied forces attack on Iraq and killed several innocent citizens.  But when the time of retaliation comes and Muslims pick up arms to form a federation of All Muslim Countries Indian and International Media feeling aching (Khujli) and they started telecasting scratchy, derogatory, defamatory and insulting news for the Muslim warriors; right from Mulla Umar, Osama Bin Laden, Hafiz Sayeed, Auyman Zaveri or Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.  Why Media have not used such types of wordings against Buddhist Terrorists Ashin Wirathu of Myanmar and Kirama Wimalajothi and Galagoda Gnanasara of Sri Lanka why media is not using such types of wording against Hindu Terrorist Pravin Thogadia, Pramod Muthalik or Subash Chouhan of Bajrang Dal, why media is not using such types of wordings for Jewish Terrorism for terrorist Israel. 

Indian Media Print and electronic using word as the militants for Palestinian police or Army one who defend themselves from Israeli terrorism, why Indian Media cannot use the same word militants or terrorists for Jewish forces or Police who are doing atrocities on innocent Palestinian children, arrest of 5 to 12 years school going Palestine boys is the regular practice by terrorist Israeli forces, they used to gang rape to the Muslim women in public, now I would like to ask question with media who is terrorist one who defend themselves from aggression or one who is doing atrocities? 

If defend to ourselves with constant and perpetual atrocities, aggression and attack from outside forces is the terrorism then every human are the terrorist, because every human being have got the defending tendency from perpetual atrocities and attack, then why word terrorists is using only for Muslims and not Hindus, Buddhist, Jews and Christians.  

It is right time to form the federation of all Islamic Countries and defend every Muslim country aggression from NATO, American and West forces.  Islamic Army should bombard on Terrorist Israel and liberate Palestine the land of Arabs.

Zuber Ahmed Khan

Journalist.